"Qui avale une noix de coco, fait confiance à son anus"
Effectivement ça n'a aucun rapport, et alors ?
Un truc qui me dérange c'est cette quote qui a été faite quelques posts plus haut :
GW2Blog.com: Hi guys! Just a little question about races, the missing races. Will these be playable in future betas, or not?
Eric Flannum
: The different races, like the sylvari and the asura? We basically haven’t talked about what content we’ll have in future beta events. We do plan on expanding the content that’s available in future beta events. What we have to do is to sort of draw a line of revealing too much so that things are spoiled to people alongside trying to get more people testing various areas. We have some kind of a [team with]core testers that have access to the entire game so there’s a lot of testing going on for the game. And these beta events where we invited tons of people are more for stress testing and getting a lot of people on the areas. So we do want to keep things fresh and keep expanding the content that’s available on beta weekends, but at the same time we don’t want to get away too much, so I’m not sure exactly how we’re going to go with that. You may see additional races available, and you may not. I think there are lots of distinctions that have to be made, and we’ll be announcing those before each particular events, all the new things that are going to be available on these events, so you guys will have some warning if the sylvari and the asura become playable in the future.
Pourquoi faire plusieurs bêtas si ils n'ajoutent pas de contenu pour ne pas spoil ? Qui plus est, si leurs bêtas publics n'a pour seul intérêt que de faire des gros stress tests (comme ils le disent), pourquoi faire plus de 2-3 bêtas ?
Donc, je pense qu'on aura encore 1 ou 2 bêtas et puis la release.
Tout cela me semble bien étrange ...
|