|
Gtx 670 OC Msi a 199€ avec le code GTX670 sur Ldlc.
http://www.ldlc.com/fiche/PB00130467...mpaign=1292902 Ca vaut plus le coup ca ou une 760 pour le coup? Dernière modification par Brimstone ; 21/07/2013 à 12h15. |
21/07/2013, 12h06 |
|
Aller à la page... |
[Bons Plans Matos] Sujet qu'il est bon !! (#2)
Suivre Répondre |
|
Partager | Rechercher |
#66357
Invité
|
Bah si t'en a rien a foutre du bruit oui ça peut valoir le coup.
|
21/07/2013, 12h19 |
|
#66357 |
|
Ok on oublie alors
|
21/07/2013, 12h26 |
|
|
y'a un code -30% sur grosbill qui fonctionne sur certains produits (à chercher au pif?) qui fait par exemple tomber ce pc à 420e.
source:dealabscomptoire-hardware Dernière modification par Zoltann ; 25/07/2013 à 01h09. |
25/07/2013, 00h54 |
|
#66357 |
|
Vous proposez quoi en souris à une vingtaine d'euros ?
Pas envie de trop dépenser pour le PC portable |
30/07/2013, 09h14 |
|
#66357
Invité
|
Une M500?
|
30/07/2013, 09h19 |
|
#66357 |
|
ça fera bien l'affaire, merci
|
30/07/2013, 09h34 |
|
|
Meme s'il y a de grandes chances que ceci se finisse en queue de poisson, un DD USB a prix très, très intéressant :
http://www.priceminister.com/offer/b...ques-durs.html |
30/07/2013, 15h08 |
|
Bagnard
|
Citation :
Elle est ou l'arnaque ? |
30/07/2013, 15h12 |
|
|
Ouais c'est super louche quand même mais je me laisserais bien tenté...
|
30/07/2013, 15h16 |
|
Bagnard
|
Le vendeur a près de 23000 ventes, mais j'ai quand même peur de voir arriver une banane sur cet article, quelqu'un saurait ce qu'il en est ?
|
30/07/2013, 15h19 |
|
|
Citation :
marre des promos sur les cartes graphiques ou SSD !!! Bon j'ai commandé , on sait jamais EDIT 15h33 : " la boutique de ce revendeur n'est plus accessible " , cela sonne la fin de cette promo fulgurante Dernière modification par MoaYs ; 30/07/2013 à 15h36. |
30/07/2013, 15h25 |
|
|
Toujours présent pour ce genre de promotion, c'est commandé en x2 !
|
30/07/2013, 15h32 |
|
Bagnard
|
Plus possible de l'ajouter au panier !
Dommage, j'étais sur le point d'en ajouter un deuxième (tant qu'à faire), mais finalement je me contenterais d'un seul |
30/07/2013, 15h34 |
|
Alpha & Oméga
|
|
30/07/2013, 15h40 |
|
|
La PS4 est à 383€ sur Top Achat. C'est pas une promo de fou, mais c'est toujours ça d'économiser.
|
31/07/2013, 17h49 |
|
Alpha & Oméga
|
Je ne savais pas trop où demander ça mais ce topic me parait correspondre, quelqu'un sait si ce site est fiable ?
J'ai fait pas mal de recherches sur le net et manifestement rien à signaler d'effrayant, mais vu les prix pratiqués j'ai quand même des doutes... Merci d'avance |
31/07/2013, 22h22 |
|
|
500$ le Mac Book Air 13" 2013 neuf...
385$ l'iPhone 5... A moins que le site ne dispose d'un fonctionnement que je ne connais pas, ça pue l'arnaque à des kilomètres. |
01/08/2013, 03h42 |
|
|
Citation :
Rien que ça... x) |
01/08/2013, 09h48 |
|
|
Quelqu'un a pas une bonne petite promo pour une cg à 150/200€ (max)
Merci d'avance ! |
01/08/2013, 11h02 |
|
|
Citation :
Voila ce que donne dnsstuf : Code:
PARENT Status Test Name Information PASS Parent zone provides NS recordsParent zone exists and provides NS records. This is good because some domains, usually third or fourth level domains, such as 'example.co.us' do not have a direct parent zone. This is legal but can cause confusion. The NS Records provided are (nameserver | IP Address | TTL): dns23.hichina.com. | 121.196.255.143 dns24.hichina.com. | 121.196.255.144 dns23.hichina.com. | 121.196.255.93 dns23.hichina.com. | 223.5.2.143 dns23.hichina.com. | 223.5.2.93 dns23.hichina.com. | 42.96.255.143 dns23.hichina.com. | 42.96.255.93 dns24.hichina.com. | 121.196.255.94 dns24.hichina.com. | 223.5.2.144 dns24.hichina.com. | 223.5.2.94 dns24.hichina.com. | 42.96.255.144 dns24.hichina.com. | 42.96.255.94 PASS Number of nameserversAt least 2 (RFC2182 section 5 recommends at least 3), but fewer than 8 NS records exist (RFC1912 section 2.8 recommends that you have no more than 7). This meets the RFC minimum requirements, but is lower than the upper limits that some domain registrars have on the number of nameservers. A larger number of nameservers reduce the load on each and, since they should be located in different locations, prevent a single point of failure. The NS Records provided are: dns23.hichina.com. | 121.196.255.143 | TTL=172800 dns24.hichina.com. | 121.196.255.144 | TTL=172800 dns23.hichina.com. | 121.196.255.93 | TTL=172800 dns23.hichina.com. | 223.5.2.143 | TTL=172800 dns23.hichina.com. | 223.5.2.93 | TTL=172800 dns23.hichina.com. | 42.96.255.143 | TTL=172800 dns23.hichina.com. | 42.96.255.93 | TTL=172800 dns24.hichina.com. | 121.196.255.94 | TTL=172800 dns24.hichina.com. | 223.5.2.144 | TTL=172800 dns24.hichina.com. | 223.5.2.94 | TTL=172800 dns24.hichina.com. | 42.96.255.144 | TTL=172800 dns24.hichina.com. | 42.96.255.94 | TTL=172800 NS Status Test Name Information PASS Unique nameserver IPsAll nameserver addresses are unique. The Nameservers provided are nameservers that supply answers for your zone, including those responsible for your mailservers or nameservers A records. If any are missing a name (No Name Provided), it is because they did not send an A record when asked for data or were not specifically asked for that data: dns23.hichina.com. | No Glue dns24.hichina.com. | No Glue PASS All nameservers respondAll nameservers responded. We were able to get a timely response for NS records from your nameservers, which indicates that they are running correctly and your zone (domain) is valid. The Nameservers provided are nameservers that supply answers for your zone, including those responsible for your mailservers or nameservers A records. If any are missing a name (No Name Provided), it is because they did not send an A record when asked for data or were not specifically asked for that data: dns23.hichina.com. | No Glue dns24.hichina.com. | No Glue WARN Open DNS serversSome or all nameservers responded to recursive queries. This should be addressed as soon as possible. Open DNS servers (i.e. externally facing DNS servers that answer recursively) increase the chances of cache poisoning, can degrade performance of your DNS, and can cause your DNS servers to be used in an attack (read RFC5358 section 4 for recommended nameserver configuration). The nameservers that responded to recursive queries are: ns4.hichina.com. | 223.5.2.124 [test] See this page for info on closing open DNS servers PASS All nameservers authoritativeAll nameservers answered authoritatively for the zone. This indicates that the zones for this domain are set up correctly on your nameservers and that we should be able to get good responses to further queries.PASS NS list matches parent listNS list matches list from parent zone. This indicates that your parent nameservers are 'aware' of the correct authoritative nameservers for your domain. This ensures less overhead for DNS queries, because an extra DNS resolution step is not required.PASS NS address list matches parent zoneNS addresses matches list from parent zone. This indicates that your parent nameservers are 'aware' of the correct authoritative nameservers for your domain. This ensures less overhead for DNS queries, because an extra DNS resolution step is not required.PASS Stealth nameserversNo stealth nameservers discovered. There is very little chance that there will be 'confusion' when resolving your domain records from the parent nameservers. There appear to be no 'extra' nameservers listed that the parent might try to refer to and cause DNS resolution delays.INFO Stealth nameservers respondNo stealth nameservers to test. This is simply a note to indicate that you do not have any stealth nameservers to test, which is what is normally expected of domains.PASS TCP allowedAll nameservers respond to queries via TCP. It is important that your DNS servers respond to both TCP and UDP connections. TCP Port 53 is used for large queries and responses, zone transfers, and is part of the DNSSEC standard.PASS Nameserver software versionResponses from nameservers do not appear to be version numbers. While version information is important internally, DNS version information displayed externally can leave your servers vulnerable to version-specific exploits. Your servers appear to hide this information and are likely safer.PASS All nameservers have identical recordsAll of your nameservers are providing the same list of nameservers.PASS All nameserver addresses are publicAll of your nameserver addresses are public. If there were any private IPs, they would not be reachable, causing DNS delays. SOA Status Test Name Information PASS SOA record checkAll nameservers provided a SOA record for the zone. This is good because your nameservers should be configured in a master slave relationship, which allows uniform updates and agreement of resource record data. The SOA records provided are: No Name Provided | 42@96.255.144Primary nameserver: dns23.hichina.com. Hostmaster E-mail address: hostmaster@hichina.com. Serial #: 2013071624 Refresh: 10800 Retry: 900 Expire: 604800 Minimum: 3600PASS SOA serial agreementAll nameserver SOAs agree on the serial number. This means that your nameservers are using the same data (unless you have different sets of data with the same serial number, which would be very bad)!WARN SOA field checkOne or more SOA fields are outside recommended ranges. Values that are out of specifications could cause delays in record updates or unnecessary network traffic. The SOA fields out of range are: expire | 604800 | EXPIRE - RFC1912 suggests a value between 1209600 to 2419200. MX Status Test Name Information PASS MX records checkTwo or more different MX records exist within the zone. This is good and ensures consistent and fail-safe mail deliverability. The MX records are: preference = 10 ASPMX3.GOOGLEMAIL.com. [173.194.65.27] preference = 1 ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. [173.194.68.27] preference = 5 ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. [173.194.66.26] preference = 5 ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. [173.194.65.26] preference = 10 ASPMX2.GOOGLEMAIL.com. [173.194.78.26] PASS Differing mailserver addressesAll hostnames referenced by MX records resolve to different IP addresses. It is important that you have different IP addresses for your MX records, as it ensures that there is not a single point of failure for mail delivery. The hostname IP addresses are: 223.5.2.93 has ASPMX3.GOOGLEMAIL.com. | 173.194.65.27 listed. 223.5.2.93 has ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. | 173.194.68.27 listed. 223.5.2.93 has ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. | 173.194.66.26 listed. 223.5.2.93 has ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com. | 173.194.65.26 listed. 223.5.2.93 has ASPMX2.GOOGLEMAIL.com. | 173.194.78.26 listed. PASS Reverse DNS entries for MX serversAll addresses referenced by MX records have matching reverse DNS entries. This is good because many mail platforms and spam-prevention schemes require consistency between MX hostnames and IP address PTR records, aka reverse DNS. MAIL Status Test Name Information PASS All IP addresses publicAll mailserver IP addresses are public. If there were any private IPs, they would not be reachable.PASS Connect to mail serverAll connections to Mailservers port 25 are successful. The standard port for SMTP transactions is 25, so your servers should be operating on that port. The Mailserver addresses are: 173.194.65.27 | connected 173.194.68.27 | connected 173.194.66.26 | connected 173.194.65.26 | connected 173.194.78.26 | connected PASS SMTP bannerAll banner greetings comply with SMTP specified format. 173.194.65.27 | 220 mx.google.com ESMTP l46si1780271een.228 - gsmtp 173.194.68.27 | 220 mx.google.com ESMTP l9si1036252qeh.102 - gsmtp 173.194.66.26 | 220 mx.google.com ESMTP bt7si1023020wib.43 - gsmtp 173.194.65.26 | 220 mx.google.com ESMTP h5si1817686eeg.20 - gsmtp 173.194.78.26 | 220 mx.google.com ESMTP xu2si1099027wjb.5 - gsmtp WARN SMTP greetingMalformed greeting or no A records found matching banner text for following servers, and banner is not an address literal. RFC5321 requires one or the other (should not be a CNAME). If this is not set correctly, some mail platforms will reject or delay mail from you, and can cause hard to diagnose issues with deliverability. Mailserver details: 173.194.65.27 | WARNING: The hostname in the SMTP greeting does not match the reverse DNS (PTR) record for your mail server. This probably won't cause any harm, but may be a technical violation of RFC5321 173.194.68.27 | WARNING: The hostname in the SMTP greeting does not match the reverse DNS (PTR) record for your mail server. This probably won't cause any harm, but may be a technical violation of RFC5321 173.194.66.26 | WARNING: The hostname in the SMTP greeting does not match the reverse DNS (PTR) record for your mail server. This probably won't cause any harm, but may be a technical violation of RFC5321 173.194.65.26 | WARNING: The hostname in the SMTP greeting does not match the reverse DNS (PTR) record for your mail server. This probably won't cause any harm, but may be a technical violation of RFC5321 173.194.78.26 | WARNING: The hostname in the SMTP greeting does not match the reverse DNS (PTR) record for your mail server. This probably won't cause any harm, but may be a technical violation of RFC5321 PASS Acceptance of NULL senderMailserver accepts mail from the null sender address. Mailservers are required to accept mail from a null sender, because this is how delivery status notifications/DSNs are delivered. 173.194.65.27 | 250 2.1.0 OK a41si1773711eew.266 - gsmtp 173.194.68.27 | 250 2.1.0 OK w11si1040563qeu.85 - gsmtp 173.194.66.26 | 250 2.1.0 OK bt7si1023134wib.43 - gsmtp 173.194.65.26 | 250 2.1.0 OK t5si1061207eeg.43 - gsmtp 173.194.78.26 | 250 2.1.0 OK k5si1075853wie.87 - gsmtp PASS Acceptance of postmasterMailserver accepts mail to postmaster. Mailservers are required by RFC822 6.3, RFC1123 5.2.7, and RFC2821 4.5.1 to have a valid postmaster address that is accepting mail. The Mailserver provided is: 173.194.65.27 | 250 2.1.5 OK s8si1778923ees.238 - gsmtp 173.194.68.27 | 250 2.1.5 OK q7si1037014qer.100 - gsmtp 173.194.66.26 | 250 2.1.5 OK c13si1022119wik.45 - gsmtp 173.194.65.26 | 250 2.1.5 OK 7si1818194eeo.19 - gsmtp 173.194.78.26 | 250 2.1.5 OK fp11si1020146wic.55 - gsmtp PASS Acceptance of abuseMailserver accepts mail to abuse. Mailservers are required by RFC2142 Section 2 to have a valid abuse address that is accepting mail. 173.194.65.27 | 250 2.1.5 OK g7si1792090eew.165 - gsmtp 173.194.68.27 | 250 2.1.5 OK n1si1058227qej.17 - gsmtp 173.194.66.26 | 250 2.1.5 OK b11si1078673wic.77 - gsmtp 173.194.65.26 | 250 2.1.5 OK k49si1785555een.202 - gsmtp 173.194.78.26 | 250 2.1.5 OK bp17si690238wib.61 - gsmtp INFO Acceptance of address literalsMailserver rejected mail to address literals. Mailservers are technically required by RFC1123 section 5.2.17 to accept mail to domain literals (i.e. IP addresses instead of domains). This ensures backwards compatibility and can help with delivery in certain non-optimal situations, like a DNS server being down/unresponsive. 173.194.65.27 | unexpected response to [RCPT TO: ] | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 n3si1795879eef.144 - gsmtp 173.194.68.27 | unexpected response to [RCPT TO: ] | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 d8si1247413qai.60 - gsmtp 173.194.66.26 | unexpected response to [RCPT TO: ] | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 er3si1087730wjd.50 - gsmtp 173.194.65.26 | unexpected response to [RCPT TO: ] | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 z8si1769685eee.299 - gsmtp 173.194.78.26 | unexpected response to [RCPT TO: ] | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 r8si1065621wjf.137 - gsmtp PASS Open relayMailserver does not appear to be an open relay. This is good. It is important to make sure that external mail servers do not relay mail for domains they are not authoritative for, so that they cannot be abused by third-parties to send unauthorized mail. 173.194.65.27 | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 l4si1788773eew.191 - gsmtp 173.194.68.27 | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 m4si1256875qae.31 - gsmtp 173.194.66.26 | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 l5si1071484wje.115 - gsmtp 173.194.65.26 | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 n3si1803288eef.114 - gsmtp 173.194.78.26 | 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/a...py?answer=6596 t6si1099942wjt.7 - gsmtp WWW Status Test Name Information INFO WWW record checkDomain has no WWW hostname record.PASS Domain recordThe domain literal has an address record, the records found are: tneee.com. | 192.210.55.38 | 600 PASS IP Address(es) validAll addresses are public. If there were any private IPs, they would not be reachable, causing problems reaching your web site.PASS WWW enabledWe connected to WWW, the title data found is: 192.210.55.38 : TNeee.com For The Global Retailer INFO SSL enabledSSL is not enabled. This is ok, but if your website offers online shopping or other private services, you should acquire an SSL cert and enable SSL. SSL will encrypt the data communication between your site and customers, helping to prevent private data from being intercepted and read. DNSSEC Status Test Name Information INFO DNSSEC records checkNo DNSSEC records created for this zone. Many major institutions and government agencies are planning to move to DNSSEC. You may want to consider an implementation plan for the zone specified. If you implemented DNSSEC for your zone we would be able to run further tests. SPF Status Test Name Information INFO SPF record checkThis domain does not have an SPF record, nor an SPF formatted TXT record. SPF stands for Sender Policy Framework and is intended as an anti-forgery email solution (See RFC4408). Many spammers have adopted this mechanism and SPF records alone may not be sufficient to stop spam. - SSL enabledSSL is not ( sécurité, confidentialité lors de la visite du site problématique) - si tu leur envoies un mail, peu de chance qu'ils le recoivent ( celui associé au site) cela explique qu'ils ont ajouté un mail externe ( ils ne savaient visiblement pas régler leur problème de MX record ) Site chinois malgré l'interface très américaine ( logistique à vérifier dans le moindre détail) . A tes risques et périls , enfin plus à tes périls, tient nous au courant si malgré tout tu as poursuivi ton achat . |
01/08/2013, 12h38 |
|
|
Priceminister récidive sur un disques externe de 3Go , bien sûr pas au même prix que la superbe offre de Born mais quand même à 100€ livré
http://www.priceminister.com/offer/b...8-9cm-3-5.html + code FFAOU2013 ( remise de 20€ pour achat > à 100€) Entre nous quand on voit l'offre précédente probablement en cours d'annulation massive, celle ci semble ridicule |
01/08/2013, 16h50 |
|
Suivre Répondre |
Fil d'ariane
Connectés sur ce fil1 connecté (0 membre et 1 invité)
Afficher la liste détaillée des connectés
|