Faux Scarlet, ce n'est pas cela la définition selon Mythic.
A: I am not sure how this idea took root, but judging from the number of appeals we’ve had on the subject, I thought I’d best clarify. No, I did not say it was okay to sit in the world geometry and exploit. Please stop telling our CSRs that I told you it was okay. I didn’t. It’s not. If you can let me know where my choice of words was confusing, I will be happy to clarify - none of us here saw anything ambiguous, but that doesn't mean much.
Also, if you are a melee, and standing on the ground, it does not follow that the guy on the roof is exploiting because you cannot hit him. The guy on the roof is exploiting if he cannot be hit by more than one damage type – such as arrows, nukes, PBAOE, etc. Melee doesn’t count in determining whether or not our little roofer is cheating.
Now, people on the same z-axis as you are cheating if you cannot hit them with melee damage (such as bridge sitters). By the way, just because someone is cheating from the same z-axis level as you, does not grant you immunity if you ALSO cheat to kill him. That just makes you both cheaters. Please /appeal the cheater, without resorting to cheating yourself.
Thanks much!
La, tu lis bien. Ici, on peut être juste en dessous d'eux, et ne pas pouvoir les toucher au cac sans avoir a grimper la haut avec l'habituelle série de petits sauts.
De plus, tu déformes les propos de mythic, un bug exploit, est une position de laquelle on ne peut pas être touché par plus d'un moyen ( arc, bolt, PBAOE, DD, nearsight... ).
Maintenant, ici, c'est clairement un bug exploit, on ne peut pas y monter normalement.
Qui plus est, monter pour le déloger au cac est aussi un bug exploit.
Maintenant Scarlet, je t'en prie, tu as tout a fait la possibilité d'aller faire joujou la haut, mais la sanction existe, et GOA a déjà sanctionné les gens la haut.
|